Descend into the Maelstrom






         My twisted thoughts unraveling on the Net

February 24, 2008

The Perfect Storm

Filed under: Current Affairs — mahout @ 7:41 pm

In the decades to come, historians will continue analyzing what
happened in the 2008 election, especially how a young African-American
inexperienced in national politics beyond a half-term in the Senate
with a funny Kenyan name came to dominate the White House bid in a
field of formidable political veterans such as McCain, Clinton,
Edwards, and Giuliani.  Yes I said it: there is no doubt in my mind
that Senator Barack Obama will easily win the election in November,
simply because he understands the electorate better than any of the
candidates do, and along the victory lap to Washington he will carry on
his shoulders a plethora of Democratic nominees picking up House seats
and Senate seats, and some of them even might be picked from Clinton’s
own superdelegate pocket.

Obama is dominating the American
political scene not just because of who he is, but also because of what
America has become.  I like to call our current situation "The Perfect
Storm:" a highly unlikely combination of historic factors that have
come together at exactly the same time that Obama has come of age
politically.  This perfect storm has made an Obama administration
inevitable.  Here’s why.  Historian in the year 2030, here is where you
can begin your research.

Bush incompetence.  This
can be summed up in one word: Brownie.  Nowadays I thank Bush every
day, despite all the foolish mistakes he has made, because he has done
more for Obama than any other human being.  Things have to be really
bad sometimes before they can get better.  Obama could not have risen
without 8 years of Bush first.  Let’s pretend for a moment that you
agree with all of Junior’s policy platforms from the last 7 years,
including the protection of America, invasion of Iraq, social security
reform, immigration reform, education reform, or fiscal
responsibility.  He has failed miserably  in every area due to the
gross incompetence of his administration.  Protecting America was
doomed from the start, with 9/11 proving that the Bush-Cheney inner
circle did not respect the threat from Al-Qaeda despite repeated and
passionate warnings.  The resulting War on Terror has produced one
failure after another: the rise of Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran; a
Taliban and Al-Qaeda resurgence when our knockout punch was nigh; Abu
Ghraib, Guantanamo, and the unproductive debates on torture,
extraordinary rendition, and spying on people’s phones.  Bush has
somehow, miraculously managed to create an American foreign policy that
is both morally wrong and undermines our national security.  Iraq was
invaded successfully, but grossly mismanaged from the beginning.  The
economy is in  dangerously poor condition.  Bush’s domestic agenda has
been defeated by one grand mistake after the other, whether it was New
Orleans in 2005, or No Child Left Behind leaving lots of kids, uh, you
know where. 

Clinton incompetence.  Just
a few weeks ago, this argument would not have applied.  Isn’t history
fascinating?  Despite Hillary’s inability to do anything productive
with healthcare while her husband was President for 8 years, and
despite presiding over an anemic Democratic party for 8 years, she
somehow managed to market herself as the most "competent" Democrat in
the race over the course of this campaign.  The only semi-decent thing
to happen to the Democrats nationally since 2000, taking back Congress
in 2006, had little to do with Clinton.   In fact, she was a cause of
this backlash, as she helped authorize the unpopular war which prompted
the 2006 takeover in the first place.  But all this was marketed away
by clever Clinton operatives.  She wasn’t knocked off the competence
pedestal, the arrogance pedestal, and any number of other pedestals
until she ran into a well-organized, grassroots-fueled Democratic
campaign that she underestimated from the start. 

Bill Clinton tomfoolery.
Bubba proved that "nobody is the boss of me."  This race would have
been a little bit closer if Bubba could have kept his mouth shut.  Now
his legacy is tarnished and he locked his wife out of the White House.
By inserting the race card into the campaign, a mass defection of
blacks was created in South Carolina and onward; overnight, we went
from a majority of blacks backing Hillary in the polls, to almost 90%
of them going for Obama.  That’s largely because they did not think
Obama was electable.  That is, until Bubba helped make him electable by
denigrating the historic accomplishments of Obama’s campaign, and then,
red-faced with righteous anger, called the senator’s staunch opposition
to Iraq a "fairy tale."   Which was itself a fairy tale.  The Hillary
people rushed forward with a muzzle, but it was already far too late to
keep the blacks and many of other races.  Thanks, Bubba: Barack took
your assist, and he SLAM-DUNKED it.

An uninspired Congress.  As
bad as the administration has been, unfathomably, Congress has been
even worse.  Lobbyists pour the slop into the pork barrel and members
of both the House and Senate feed like starving pigs.  The swing from
Republican control to Democratic control has not created an
improvement, and many Americans see both parties complicit in the dirty
Congressional politics of getting nothing done.   They see a
Washington  where the president bickers with Congress, Republicans
bicker with Democrats, they’re all rich and corrupt, and the only
losers are working Americans.

America is polarized, and tired of it. Bush
oversaw a dramatic polarization of the country, an uncivil war between
blue states and red states, one where reasonable citizens on both sides
of the Republican/Democrat divide honestly believed that the other side
was ruining their country.  Karl Rove engineered this drama, and it was
effective toward the goal of getting elections won by small margins.
America now yearns to move on from this 51/49 life and follow a leader
who is actually intelligent, competent, and able to get something done,
get it done right, and get it done on principles most of us can rally
behind.  This is the promise of Barack Obama; we should be clear that
he hasn’t yet proved that he can deliver this yet, but America is more
than willing to give him a chance.  Luckily, things cannot easily get
worse on the polarization front than they are now.  The level of
gridlock is at saturation point, the level of discourse is toxic, and
politics have nowhere to go but up.  Nothing positive of note is going
on at the federal level today except some aid for Africa. 

McCain will sink on the Iraq ship.  McCain
too is a response to this polarization, as his party conceded that the
only chance at victory would be the least-reviled Republican figure.
Some Dems are worried that McCain will poach enough of the nation’s
independents to eke victory because he occupies the center, the same
place where his opponent likes to roost.  On issues such as the
environment, campaign finance reform, torture, and the economy, he is
not radically different from most Democrats.  Liberals should relax.
McCain only has one card to play, which is fear.  Obama will not keep
you and your children safe!  He’ll take your gun away! He is weak on
national security!  He wants us to surrender!  There are wolves
circling around us in the woods!  But his only card is undermined on
the most important national security matter of the day, Iraq. McCain is
on the side of the failed Republican policies.  A.K.A., the wrong side
of the voters.   

Loud, Dumb Republicans.  Sean
Hannity, Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, and Rush Limbaugh: this is a
case of "everyone wins."  Obama will win thanks in part to your
hysterics, and good days are ahead for you too.  You would love nothing
more than to attack an incumbent Democrat in the White House so your
ratings, and sense of self-importance, will go up for at least four
more years.  It’s no coincidence that they’re skewering McCain:
right-wing lightweights clearly don’t want him to win.  The same old,
tired messages of abortion, bashing gay rights,  how the media favors
President Obama, "liberals = unpatriotic = terrorists," the frightening
prospect of another liberal Supreme Court justice, and the evils of
Islam will continue to play out on the airwaves daily during the Obama
administration.  But the messages of hate won’t get across to many
beyond their little choir. 

They’ve got nothing on Obama.
I have read just about everything the right-wing lunatic fringe has
written or said about Obama, pouring over anything they’ve written
against him, and whatever Fox News has been able to come up with.  The
fact is, they have nothing on him at this point beyond supermarket
tabloid stuff.  Obama is a foreign spy.  Michelle Obama hates you.
In other words, zero.  If he gets through Clinton in one piece, we can
be confident there is nothing else to find.  If her people found
anything more than alleged plagiarism and a friendship with Tony Rezko,
they would have used it.  It was fortunate that Obama was forthcoming
long ago about his drug use as a young man; more than we can say about
Bush, Clinton, or for that matter Rush Limbaugh as an older man.

Only one candidate represents the next generation of America.
We haven’t had a  politician who youngsters think is "cool" campaigning
for president since Bill Clinton in 1992.  Many who are too young to
even vote suddenly care about politics for the first time.   This isn’t
an accident; it’s partly because their older and wiser parents are
sensing a historic movement; civics teachers are getting tingly as they
teach their students; Obama is most accessible at only 46 years old; he
will be the first post-baby boom president; and the Obama campaign has
spent an enormous amount of resources on courting the young, something
few campaigns in American history have bothered to do.   Most younger
voters don’t see Obama as black, but just as a dude they would like to
see in the White House because he, like, speaks to them.

Obama represents what we want from a leader for some of the wrong reasons.
Here is where the politically incorrect stuff comes in.  Yes, some
blacks are voting for him in droves largely just because he is black.
Women are voting (and fainting!) for him because they have a massive
crush on the tall, dark, and handsome guy.  Older whites are voting for
him due to white guilt:  they know their race has stomped on blacks for
centuries, and voting for Obama is a bit of a mea culpa.
Americans like myself with a dual identity identify with his
connections to Indonesia and Kenya.  Whether voting for these
irrational reasons is right or wrong, people have always voted along
these lines, and they always will.  We are fortunate that in this case
at least, they have accidentally voted correctly.

These
are the factors that perfect storms are made of.  It will be a long and
bumpy ride to November, but come January 2009, it will be a new day in
America.  Let’s hope for peaceful waters afterward- and above all, be
glad that you were a part of it.

February 12, 2008

Obama vs. Hillary- the Answer

Filed under: Current Affairs — mahout @ 10:06 pm
M.S.J.

Election ‘08 continues to unfold- in many different directions.  For
the first time since 1952 there is no sitting president or
vice-president in the race, nor even an endorsement from the White
House for a candidate.  The Republicans have finally finished
bludgeoning one another in search of the party’s soul, but only just
long enough to have a bloodied nominee emerge via the "surge," Senator
John McCain.  Large factions of the GOP have now regained their breath
and have initiated a gang-torturing of their presumptive nominee for
not conforming to their domestic policy desires. Of course Mr. Huckabee
has stayed in the race to no consequence, only to feed his delusions of
grandeur and perhaps add conversational fodder for his personal cell
phone calls with God.  Either that, or he’s insane; the question about
this man’s sanity has been one of the most fun aspects of this whole
race.

Which is saying an incredible amount.  This has been an unbelievably
fascinating presidential race, epic to start with if only because three
types of human being emerged to become serious candidates for the White
House for the first time in history: a black, a Mormon, and a woman.
The Mormon, Mitt Romney, turned out to be not-so-special after all: he
only sleeps with one woman, that too his wife (how boring!), and even
worse, he turned out to be a corporate, WASPish automaton who had no
core beliefs.  He wisely bowed down to McCain.  So did third-rate actor
(and fourth-rate candidate) Fred Thompson, and the 9/11-horse-beating
Rudy Giuliani.  On the Dem side, Edwards had the good sense to bow out
quickly to prepare himself for a job in the new administration.

The black, Barack Obama, and the woman, Hillary Clinton, are locked
in a more important race, because it’s likely to be for the
presidency.  November isn’t here yet, but after Iraq, Katrina, Libbey,
DeLay, Abramoff, a scorched earth, and a crumbling real estate market,
Republicans may as well get ready to kiss the White House goodbye.  In
fact the election of a centrist like McCain is sort of an early
admission of defeat, and I think most pundits on both sides of the
aisle recognize this.  This is of course barring a massive choke by the
Democrats, which we cannot rule out completely. 

So the race for the Democratic party is far closer, more
consequential, and consequently more brutal, a race that could last all
the way to the Democratic national convention in late summer.  But it
shouldn’t.  By now it should be clear to all Democrats that Barack
Obama has earned the right to be their nominee for President.
Many people are on the fence, and this is aimed squarely at you.  Here
is why the party should quit its pointless civil war and rally around
Obama.

- Obama is more likely to defeat McCain than Clinton.
Poll after poll by independent sources confirms this.  The more people
get to know Obama, the greater his margin of victory appears to be in
the polls.  People have already known Clinton and McCain for decades.
Most aren’t likely to change their minds about either, unless Obama
stumbles badly.  By the way, Obama hasn’t stumbled yet in a year of
campaigning, largely from way behind.
- Obama has no experience?
Okay, so being a civil rights lawyer isn’t experience to be a leader?
Being a constitutional law professor doesn’t prepare one for public
service?  8 years as an Illinois state Senator- chopped liver, you
say?  3 and a half years on the cold, mean streets of Chicago helping
poor people get jobs- negligible?  Winning 70% of the vote in a
successful U.S. Senate bid- dumb luck?  FIGHTING THE CLINTON MACHINE TO
AN ABSOLUTE STANDSTILL IN A PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN?  One can’t even
pretend to argue this one.  Now that’s experience.  The fact that Obama
is out-maneuvering Hillary and her wily husband, the leaders of the
Democratic party for 16 straight years in this high-stakes race
demonstrates a lot of executive experience in itself.  Try successfully
managing a budget of over $100 million, a staff of over 700 employees
and hundreds of thousands of volunteers in all 50 states before
bringing up the ‘e’ word.
- Obama is getting the youth vote out in epic proportions.
And they are swinging for him 80%.  80% !!!  This may turn out to be a
record year for under-30 participation in any U.S. election- it could
even beat the year that 18 year olds were allowed to vote for the first
time in 1972, when the voting age was lowered from 21.  It’s also the
main reason why pollsters are left busily scratching their asses and
mumbling into the mirror.
- Obama has won 8 straight party primaries and caucuses by
mostly overwhelming margins, representing every region of the country.
When is the last time a presidential candidate from any party
has done so?  Let alone an unknown who nobody had heard of, who did not
come into the race with most of the establishment connections behind
him?
- More significant than the fact that these kids are voting, is the fact that many kids are actually excited about politics and the political process for the first time in their lives.
How many smart young people do I know that have never cared about
politics until now?  Um, how about ALMOST ALL OF THEM?  I went to
college in the nation’s capital itself, and large swaths of my
colleagues were disengaged from government at all levels, largely due
to disgust, and rightly so.  For people who have been interested in
government for many years, it’s an exciting time to see people who
didn’t know the difference between the two major parties, start talking
about delegates and superdelegates.  It’s all because of Obama.  To a
lesser degree, Obama is also inspiring older people- including the
parents who had been disengaged for many decades- to vote and even care.
- Obama can more easily build a consensus to get things done.
This is related to the above point: getting citizens involved matters.
We all know that Hillary and Obama have nearly the exact same
platform.  (1) Reform health care to make it universally
accessible. (2) Bring troops home on a timetable. (3) Fix the
environment.  If you think the policy minutiae on any of these issues
matter for a president, you’re wrong.  The same small group of liberal
academic wonks will be advising either one as the next president on all
three initiatives.  More important is inspiring confidence and hope in
the nation.  To the extent that any of these things can ever be done,
you need a uniter to make them happen, to convince fierce opposing
forces such as vested interests that these are the right things to do.
And if that fails, crush them with popular support.  If Congress
gives Obama a hard time, I am confident he can go straight to the
American people and say, "get your Congressman in line!" and it will
happen.  Hillary always was, and always will be, too divisive a figure
to accomplish this.  I’ll admit that this is *partly* not her fault. 
- The Republican party’s wise men have conceded that come November, they will sink or swim on one issue: Iraq.
Not immigration, not torture, not the environment, and not the
economy.  That’s because McCain does not split deeply from many
liberals on these issues, certainly not either Democrat.  So the party
faithful are praying hard that Iraq turns into a big Mall of America
just in time for the election, or at least a strip mall without an
armored checkpoint.  Iraq represents the one area where Obama and
Clinton have a clear difference.  Clinton, like McCain, voted to
authorize the war.  Obama was always against it.  Does that affect how
anyone’s policy decisions on Iraq will be made in the future?  Perhaps,
perhaps not.  The point is, only Obama has credibility on saying what
he believed in 2002.  And it will matter, because Iraq will still be a
mess in November, surge or no surge.
- Which brings up the larger issue with Clinton.  She almost never says what she truly believes, because she is always "triangulating" and saying what is most politically expedient.
Nobody has written about this better than my fellow Konkani, Fareed
Zakaria in the clear comparison of the two candidates in
his recent article.
- We have already lived through 8 years with the Clintons

in the White House, and they were largely okay years for most
Americans.  But do we want to re-live all the same vicious battles
again?  The intra- and inter- party vituperation that dominated
Washington on every issue, whether real or related to a semen-soaked
dress?  Wingnuts screaming even louder than they do now on talk-radio
and television newscasts, to even larger audiences?  There has been a
Bush or a Clinton working in the White House every day since January
1981.  It’s time to moveon.org!
1992-2000 were mostly good years, so let’s remember the Clintons for that
happy time and not as the aging wannabe hipsters who won’t graciously
let go of the reins of power to the younger and more popular Barack
Obama.  It’s time to get past the culture wars, and only one candidate
can deliver that, partly because:
- Barack makes Americans feel better about themselves, due to his background and positive oratory.
He is a post-racial candidate- he isn’t black or white, but half of
each: both and neither at the same time.  Like, don’t try to pigeonhole
him.  In fact, I have never heard him say the word ‘black’ in a speech
except to deliver platitudes such as, "this race is not about young
versus old….black versus white…but the past versus the future."
He represents us - America - moving on from the politics of the past
based on class,
race, gender, and age with his easy dual identity
as an open-minded African-American.  He inspires people of all
types not because he is the black candidate some have been yearning
for, but because he is not.  In fact, he wrote a touching book, "Dreams
from My Father" that displayed a great deal of intellectual curiosity
as he tried to sort through his complex background, growing up in
Hawaii, Indonesia, and mainland USA after his Kenyan father left his
white mother from Kansas.  His conclusion was that his identity would
defy categorization, as would his public career.  And this best-seller
was written in Obama’s early 30s.  Contrast that with Hillary, who
beats you over the head with her womanhood.  On her website you can
join "Women for Hillary!"  Watch her cry- not when the bodybags arrive
home from her war, but whenever she falls behind in the race.  Or more
likely, when she thinks it will help her win it.

Whatever happens, this has been a great race.  I just hope you will
get on the winning side early enough to enjoy the ride before the real
hard work begins after the inauguration.  And because we are witnessing
a truly great moment in American history, a grassroots movement far
larger than a mere campaign that will make the country and the world a
far better place than it was when we found it.  Just a few months ago I
had been in despair that this was not possible; that under George W.
Bush America had done irreparable harm to itself and the world.  Now I
have learned, not just because of Barack Obama, but because of the fact
that he makes all who he has touched want to be better people, that we
are headed in the right direction at last.  I have never felt this way
before, as cheesy as that sounds.  And Obama expresses the sentiment
better than anyone else could, as with most things he says:

"We are the change that we’ve been waiting for."
 
Side note: 1992 is the year that got me high on
presidential politics for the first time.  That’s because back then, at
the tender age of 13, I read an excellent book called "On Wings of
Eagles" by chance when I found it in my uncle’s basement.  It’s a
non-fiction account by Ken Follett of the exploits by a small group
of men in 1979 who got together and staged a top-secret, daring raid
into the heart of Iran to free American hostages.  It was masterminded
and bankrolled not by the government, but by a private, rich individual
named Ross Perot.  Ross Perot set up the raid to free several of his
employees at the company EDS who were swept up as hostages along with
hundreds of other Americans living in Tehran.  As CEO, Perot felt
responsible for getting his employees out and back to their families;
not only did he get them out, but the operation made for a gripping
tale- complete with a drunken, divorced, and depressed ex-special
forces commando who led the squad into Iran; a couple of white-collar
EDS corporate climbers who learned how to kill people by stabbing them
in the kidneys; a getaway car that had pictures of the various Iranian
opposition leaders ready to display depending on which town they would
be going through; a U.S. government that sat lamely by on the
sidelines; bad  Iranian guys; and a happy ending.  I was 13 years old,
and this was the coolest story in the world.  Ross Perot was the
coolest dude in the world!  When he ran for president, I wanted him to
win very badly.  I stayed up late to watch his infomercials and debate
reruns.  In fact, it’s still a point of pride for me today that I
convinced several of my 8th grade teachers to vote for Perot based on
the social studies report I wrote on him.  That was a fun time, an
interesting 3-way race which ended the first Bush presidency, but it
also ushered in 16 years of Clinton and one more Bush.  Of course, I
was wrong about Perot’s presidential chops, misguided by a dramatic
story.  But Perot invoked a passion for politics into that race, along
with the other two candidates of ‘92 that has been largely absent
since.  And ‘92 was nowhere near as gripping as the ‘08 race has shaped
up to be- and it’s far from over.